Peer Review Policy

Green Publication follows a transparent and rigorous peer review process to ensure the highest academic integrity. All submitted manuscripts undergo a quality check, plagiarism screening, and a systematic review conducted by qualified subject experts. Our review system is designed to maintain fairness, confidentiality, and unbiased evaluation.

Editors conducting peer review for submissions to peer reviewed journals and updating the list of peer reviewed journals

Peer Review Guidelines

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to verify quality, relevance, and ethical compliance before being sent for review.
Research papers are assigned to qualified reviewers with expertise related to the manuscript topic to ensure authentic and fair evaluation.
Green Publication maintains a double-blind peer review model where both the author and reviewers remain anonymous to prevent bias.
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts for originality, clarity, contribution to the field, methodology accuracy, and ethical adherence.
Authors may be requested to submit revisions based on reviewers' feedback and editorial suggestions before acceptance.
The editorial board reserves the right to reject manuscripts that violate ethical standards, contain plagiarized content, or lack scientific validity.
Reviewer comments and decisions remain confidential and are not shared publicly.
Final acceptance is based on reviewer recommendations and the decision of the editorial board.