Peer Review Policy
At Green Publication, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality through a rigorous peer review process. This policy outlines our approach to ensuring fairness, objectivity, and thoroughness in evaluating all submitted manuscripts. Every submission undergoes an initial editorial screening to ensure it meets the basic criteria of quality, scope, and ethical compliance. Manuscripts that pass this stage are then sent for double-blind peer review, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to eliminate bias. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are expected to provide constructive, timely, and unbiased feedback to help authors improve the clarity, validity, and significance of their work. All decisions—acceptance, revision, or rejection—are based on reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial team’s final assessment. We take all review feedback seriously and may involve additional reviewers if needed to reach a fair decision. The integrity of the peer review process is central to our mission, and we continuously work to ensure transparency, accountability, and excellence in scholarly publishing.
Review Process
- Initial Screening: All submissions are first reviewed by the editorial team for compliance with journal guidelines and scope.
- Editorial Assessment: The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor evaluates the manuscript's suitability for peer review.
- Peer Review: Qualified reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, significance, methodology, and presentation.
- Decision: Based on reviewer feedback, the editorial team makes one of the following decisions:
- Accept as is
- Accept with minor revisions
- Major revisions required
- Reject
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers are expected to:
- Maintain confidentiality of the review process
- Declare any conflicts of interest
- Provide constructive, objective, and detailed feedback
- Evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit and originality
- Respect intellectual independence of authors
Author Responsibilities
Authors should:
- Submit original work that has not been published elsewhere
- Ensure all co-authors meet the criteria for authorship
- Disclose any conflicts of interest
- Respond to reviewer comments in a timely and professional manner
- Make data and materials available for verification when appropriate
Ethical Considerations
We adhere to the highest ethical standards in publishing. Any cases of ethical misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, or authorship disputes, will be investigated according to COPE guidelines.